The integrity of the nation-state has disintegrated under the pressure of the world’s economic system. For Michael Keating, a politics professor at the University of Aberdeen, this economic ‘rescaling’ of the nation-state has been shifting national identity and reshaping the nationalist movement in Scotland. And then Brexit came along… Keating was one of 13 experts who shared their thoughts at Eurac Research’s Summer School on Human Rights, Minorities and Diversity Governance, which finished up on June 29th.

How are ideas of nations, nationalism, boundaries changing in Europe?
There has been a tendency in the past to think of the nation-state as having set boundaries—a shared national identity, a state with sovereignty over internal matters, a national economy, and so forth. The aspiration of nation builders was to get all those things to correspond. That’s become much more difficult nowadays as economies escape state boundaries. Now we talk about global production chains, continental economies, corporations that work transnationally. At the same time, the economy is localizing because local factors are critical in determining prosperity. Economies are spilling above and below the state, and supranational and subnational identities are no longer corresponding with the nation-state. This is what we call, “rescaling”.
How has “rescaling” affected nationalism in Europe?
Nationalist movements have latched onto it because rescaling is always political: it covers the spectrum, from the far left to the far right. There are winners and losers when it comes to European integration, global free trade and local economies. When these boundaries shift, winners and losers within those boundaries change. Nationalists who push for new states within existing states will say, “Not only has the existing state failed to recognise our identities, but it is functionally inefficient, as well.”

But these independence movements are still about dividing. Does that not harken back to the old days of the nation-state?
Many nationalists would argue that they are not setting up a smaller version of a nation-state, but that the model of the nation-state is no longer appropriate. They would say, “We operate in a multilevel system and we recognize this better than the state-level does. We don’t want our new state in the old-fashioned sense. We are going beyond that. We want a capacity to operate at multiple levels. We like sharing sovereignty.” In the case of Scotland, independence means sharing the British pound and all kind of institutions with the UK. That’s what I call the “post-sovereignty” argument. Independence is not what it used to be.

Economies are spilling above and below the state, and supranational and subnational identities are no longer corresponding with the nation-state. This is what we call, “rescaling”.

Michael Keating

How is Brexit changing the post-sovereigntist movement in Scotland?
Brexiters voted by and large to bring all the sovereignty back to one place, to Westminster. But those powers don’t belong only to Westminster—they belong to the Scottish Parliament and the Welsh Assembly and the Northern Ireland Assembly, as well. People in England think it’s a unitary state, but it’s not—it’s a quasi-federal state, it’s a complex pluri-national union. If you think of the UK as an asymmetrical federation, a work-in-progress that is constantly being renegotiated—this is exactly what the European Union is like. That’s why Scotland’s position in the UK fits very well into the EU. But the way out of the Scottish dilemma—the “let’s-go-independent-and-remain-in-the-EU’ approach”—is looking difficult today, politically. Scotland trades four times as much with England as with the rest of the UK. If there is to be a hard border between England and Scotland, that’s a hard sell for Scottish voters. The majority of Scottish voters want to stay in both the UK and the EU. They don’t want to come out of the UK union and go into the EU, if that means cutting themselves off from the UK market.

Related Articles

Article
La destinazione preferita in estate? Sarà la montagna

Buone notizie per gli operatori turistici della regione Trentino - Alto Adige Un’indagine condotta su campione di più di 1.500 italiani indica che la montagna sarà probabilmente la destinazione preferita per le vacanze estive 2020. L’indagine sulle esigenze degli italiani in merito alla riapertura del settore turistico è stata condotta dalla prof.ssa Linda Osti (Libera Università di Bolzano) e dalla ricercatrice Consuelo R. Nava (Università della Valle d’Aosta). Molto sentita anche la necessità di ricevere informazioni in tempo reale sul grado di affollamento di attrazioni e percorsi turistici.

Article
App per le confessioni e messe in streaming

Il distanziamento sociale è diventato il nostro pane quotidiano e mai come in questo momento siamo stati così dipendenti dai nuovi media e dalle nuove tecnologie. La loro adozione e diffusione ha subito una accelerazione che in tempi normali avrebbe richiesto anni per diventare realtà ed è ragionevole supporre che in molti casi non torneremo sui nostri passi, ma alcuni cambiamenti diventeranno la normalità anche nel periodo post-crisi. Questa “digitalizzazione forzata” influeza praticamente tutti, pervadendo i più disparati aspetti della nostra vita, dal lavoro alla scuola, dal modo in cui ci teniamo informati e interagiamo con gli altri fino al modo in cui viviamo la nostra stessa spiritualità e religiosità.

Article
A new compulsion to locality

In 2002 the sociologist John Urry defined contemporary man as subject with two fundamental drives: the compulsion to mobility and the compulsion to proximity. Although communication technology allows many of us to avoid the majority of physical movements, society – as well as our personal goals and desires – compels us to move through space in order to reach other bodies, with them we experience situations of proximity in other places. It is not only a matter of choice: there are widespread obligations and expectations in this sense. Urry calls this phenomenon, the globalisation of intermittent presence.

Article
Crowdfunding: il narcisismo è nemico del successo

“Il progetto più bello del reame”. In che modo il narcisismo può ostacolare il successo di una campagna di crowdfunding? Lo ha scoperto una ricerca di Paola Rovelli e Vincenzo Butticé, ricercatori del Centro per il Family Business Management e della MIP School of Business del Politecnico di Milano che hanno esaminato circa 60.000 campagne di crowdfunding su Kickstarter. I risultati? Mantenere un profilo basso, improntato all’oggettività, può costituire un vantaggio rispetto a chi si propone in maniera eccessivamente improntata all’autoaffermazione.